On a typical Monday evening in Van Nuys, an unexpected event occurred that sent shockwaves throughout the local community. In a car accident involving two vehicles, a male and a female found themselves subjected to injuries that, while not life-threatening, were nonetheless severe enough to require immediate medical attention. According to reports from the Los […]
A California appeals court recently dismissed a personal injury case against several defendants after an independent contractor was injured at a work site.
In a recent personal injury case before a California appeals court, the court considered whether the firefighter’s rule applied in a case involving the plaintiff’s fall at an architectural residence.
In a recent case before a California court of appeals, the plaintiff argued that a national fraternity was liable for injuries she suffered at a frat party.
Under California personal injury law, the owner of a dog that bites or injures another person may be held liable for the injuries caused by their animal. However, the manner in which a California dog bite victim must go about in proving their case depends on the facts surrounding the accident.
In a recent California personal injury case, a student brought a negligence claim against the University of Southern California (USC) for injuries she suffered at a fraternity party. The student, who was not attending USC, was apparently attending a fraternity party near USC and was dancing on a makeshift platform when another person bumped into her. The student fell and suffered serious injuries as a result. The student claimed that USC had a duty to protect her from an unreasonable risk of harm and that the University failed to protect her by failing to shut down or prevent the party.
For young students, schools not only serve as a place of learning, but also provide essential oversight and supervision to children who are too young to care for themselves. Of course, as students get older, they can care for themselves. However, they still spend a significant portion of their time on campus. Thus, the duty […]
Earlier this year, a California appellate court considered a case brought against a public college by a visiting athlete. The court ultimately concluded that the public college was not entitled to immunity and allowed the plaintiff’s case to proceed. The Facts of the Case According to the court’s opinion, the plaintiff, a student-athlete at a public college […]
One of the benefits of living in California is that many parts of the state have great weather. Due to the pleasant conditions, lots of restaurants have outdoor patio seating for patrons to enjoy their meals under the sun. However, sometimes disaster strikes. In this case, a woman was eating lunch on the patio of […]
A plaintiff sued Wal-Mart for injuries she sustained at one of Wal-Mart’s stores while acting within the course and scope of her employment with Acosta, Inc. The trial court found Wal-Mart liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. Under California Labor Code sections 3852 and 3856, appellant Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (Hartford) applied for a lien […]
Traverse City
300 E Front St #445
Traverse City, MI 49684
Phone: (231) 221-0050
Fax: (231) 221-0051
Grand Rapids
250 Monroe Ave NW, #400
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
Phone: (616) 717-5666
Fax: (231) 221-0051
Detroit
400 Renaissance Center #2600
Detroit, MI 48243
Phone: (248) 216-1660
Fax: (231) 221-0051
Los Angeles
633 W 5th St 28th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Phone: (213) 277-0001
Fax: (231) 221-0051
Boston
361 Newbury Street
3rd – 5th Floor
Boston, MA 02115
Phone: (617) 918-7790
Fax: (231) 221-0051
New York
One Rockefeller Plaza 10th Floor
New York, NY 10020
Phone: (212) 882-1900
Fax: (231) 221-0051
Toll Free: 800-525-NEUMANN (800-525-6386) Fax: (231) 221-0051
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.